How to evaluate sources
Good papers are built on good sources. Here’s a fast way to judge whether a source is worth citing.
A five-point checklist
- Currency — is it recent enough for your topic?
- Relevance — does it actually address your question, at the right depth?
- Authority — who wrote it, and what’s their expertise? Who published it?
- Accuracy — are claims supported by evidence you can check?
- Purpose — is it meant to inform, or to sell or persuade?
Primary, secondary, tertiary
A primary source is first-hand (raw data, a letter, an experiment). A secondary source analyses primary ones (a journal review, a textbook). A tertiary source summarises the field (an encyclopedia). Strong papers lean on primary and peer-reviewed secondary sources.
Where the Study search fits
The Study search deliberately returns results only from trusted, ad-free educational sources, so you start from solid ground. Use it to orient yourself, then follow the references to primary and scholarly work — and cite those.
Frequently asked questions
What makes a source credible?
What’s the difference between primary and secondary sources?
Are scholarly sources always better?
Is Wikipedia a reliable source?
These guides explain the current editions in plain language and are a study aid, not official style manuals. For exact rules and edge cases, check your assignment brief and the official APA, MLA or Chicago guidance — and when in doubt, ask your instructor.